Intel details future graphics chip at GDC

On Friday, Intel engineers are detailing the inner workings of the company's first graphics chip in over a decade at the Game Developers Conference in San Francisco--sending a signal to the game industry that the world's largest chipmaker intends to be a player.

During a conference call that served as a preview to the GDC sessions, Tom Forsyth, a software and hardware architect at Intel working on the Larrabee graphics chip project, discussed the design of Larrabee, a chip aimed squarely at Nvidia and at Advanced Micro Devices' ATI unit.

And Nvidia and AMD will no doubt be watching the progress intently. Intel's extensive and deep relationships with computer makers could give it an inside track with customers and upset the graphics duopoly now enjoyed by Nvidia and AMD. In the last decade Intel has not competed in the standalone, or "discrete" graphics chip market where Nvidia and AMD dominate. Rather, it has been a supplier of integrated graphics, a low-performance technology built into its chipsets that offers only a minimal gaming experience. (In the 1990s, Intel introduced the i740 GPU which, in relative terms, was not a success.)

Forsyth said that there is not yet a Larrabee chip to work with--it's expected late this year or early next year--and that "a lot of key developers are still being consulted on the design of Larrabee." But Intel will offer ways for developers to test the processor, he said. "On the Intel Web site there will be a C++ prototype library. It doesn't have the speed of Larrabee but has the same functionality. Developers can get a feel for the language, get a feel for the power of the machine."

Beyond games, Intel is also trying to catch a building wave of applications that run on the many-core architectures inherent to graphics chips. Nvidia and AMD graphics chips pack hundreds of processing cores that can be tapped for not only accelerating sophisticated games like Crysis but for doing scientific research and high-performance computing tasks.

One of the largest test sites for Larrabee is Dreamworks, which will use Larrabee for rendering and animation. To date, Dreamworks had to wait overnight to get a rendering project completed. "Using (the) Nehalem (processor), Dreamworks can almost do it in real time and it is only going to better with Larrabee," said Nick Knupffer, an Intel spokesperson.

Larrabee is "Intel's first many-core architecture," Forsyth said. "The first product will be very much like a GPU. It will look like a GPU. You will plug it into a machine and it will display graphics," he said. (GPU stands for graphics processing unit.)

"But at its heart are processor cores, not GPU cores. So it's bringing that x86 programmable goodness to developers," Forsyth said. Larrabee will carry the DNA of Intel's x86 architecture, the most widely used PC chip design in the world.

ntel is touting the performance of Larrabee's vector unit.

(Credit: Intel)

"It's based on a lot of small, efficient in-order cores. And we put a whole bunch of them on one bit of silicon. We join them together with very high bandwidth communication so they can talk to each other very fast and they can talk to off-chip memory very fast and they can talk to other various units on the chip very fast." In-order processing cores are used, for example, in the original Pentium design and in Intel's Atom processor.

"It's the same programming model they know from multicore systems already but there's a lot more of them," he said.

The centerpiece of the chip's core is the vector unit, used to process many operations simultaneously. "The interesting part of the programming model is the SIMD (single instruction, multiple data) vector unit and the instructions that go with it," Forsyth said. "We want to show off this big new vector unit and the instruction set."

Forsyth described what the vector unit can do and how it works with the scalar unit. "(The vector unit) can do 16 floating point operations every single clock. That's a lot of horsepower. Even in just one of these cores--and we have a lot of these cores. So it's a very high-throughput unit. The good thing is that it's independent of the scalar unit. You can issue instructions on the scalar unit and vector unit at the same time. The scalar unit is extremely useful for calculating addresses, doing flow control, doing housekeeping--and keeps all those miscellaneous tasks off the real powerhouse, which is the vector unit."

At GDC, Intel is encouraging developers to experiment. "They're going to have questions about how do I find 16 things to do at once. But a lot of it is just getting in there and playing with the thing," according to Forsyth. The GDC sessions will be a tour around Larrabee's instructions--"how to actually use these new instructions," he said.

And what about markets beyond gaming? "A funny thing happened on the way to the architecture. We designed this architecture to be 100 percent graphics focused. Whatever we needed to do to get graphics good, we did. And then a year ago, we looked at what we had and said how much of this stuff is actually specific to graphics. It turns out, very little. Graphics workloads are increasingly similar to GPGPU (general-purpose graphics processor unit), increasingly similar to high-powered (high-performance) computing. So, we actually have very little that is specific to graphics. Most of the instruction set is very general-purpose."

Skype for iPhone: It's official

Months after teasing us at CES with an announcement of Skype's native VoIP client for the iPhone, the free Skype for iPhone will finally be available to download from the iTunes App Store sometime on Tuesday. We got a chance to sit down with the application's principal engineer before the announcement was made at CTIA 2009, to see Skype for iPhone do its thing. While most of the features aren't too surprising--Skype does want to maintain some consistency across its mobile applications, after all--there are a few capabilities that are notably missing, and a few iPhone-only perks that are refreshing to see.

At long last, Skype has come to the iPhone.

(Credit: Skype)

In terms of navigation, Skype's VoIP app for iPhone looks more like your traditional iPhone app than it does Skype 4.0 for Windows. For many who already prefer Apple's sleek interface archetype, that's a triumph, but those who enjoy Skype's branding may feel disappointed.

Skype's screens are well organized and use the iPhone's ability to add filters, for instance, to sort your contacts alphabetically, or by who's online. There's chatting as well, though Skype's flagship feature is its VoIP calling that's free to other Skype users and an inexpensive per-minute fee to landlines. Calls on Skype for iPhone work only if you're in range of a Wi-Fi network, so your call quality will in part be at the mercy and strength of wireless networks nearby--calls will not work over the cell phone network on the iPhone (but chatting will.) Assuming your connection is solid, you can dial a number or quickly call a contacts stored in your address book. iPod Touch users will need earphones with an embedded mic to talk. During a call, you can mute the line, go on hold, or put the call on speakerphone. In the My Info window, you can follow a link to buy more SkypeOut credit online.

Taking a photo from within Skype to serve as your avatar image, or pulling a picture in from the camera roll are two iPhone-only features that makes use of the phone's hardware attributes. Another imperfect, but still neat, feature is the ability to accept incoming conference calls. While you won't be able to initiate a call, we're told, you will be able to jump on one if a buddy invites you in. We hope the next version includes placing conference calls from the iPhone.

Skype left a few more skills out of its maiden iPhone voyage. SMS, setting up a conference calling group, purchasing SkypeOut credit directly, and being able to field a second incoming Skype call are a few. File transferring and getting Skype voicemail native on the phone are two more. We expect to see at least two of these added in the next version, but we'll hope for more.

Skype versus the competition
Here's the big question on our minds: will Skype's iPhone app replace competitors like Nimbuzz and Fring, which focus on cross-network IM but also include VoIP calls with Skype pals even though they've been available for the iPhone for months? Kurt Thywissen, the principal engineer for Skype for iPhone, thinks so. He says what the other apps use is a workaround that requires them to channel calls through a server and transcode audio, resulting in poorer-quality calls than Skype can do in its own app. He may be right, but those who IM more than they vocalize probably won't ditch the likes of Fring too soon. They might, however, let Skype handle the calls and let another app take care of the multinetwork chatting.

Inside Skype for iPhone--photos

Amazon, Microsoft reject 'Open Cloud Manifesto'

The cloud-computing field may be in its infancy, but there is a fight breaking out at the preschool.

A group of Web services providers, reportedly including IBM, is set to unveil a "manifesto" next week that lays out a number of principles for open cloud computing. Two of the biggest names in the field, though, say they aren't signing on.

Microsoft posted blog message to that effect on Wednesday night, while Amazon.com on Friday said it, too, is not among the companies signing the document.

"Like other ideas on standards and practices, we'll review this one," Amazon said in a statement. "Ideas on openness and standards have been talked about for years in Web services. And we do believe standards will continue to evolve in the cloud-computing space. But what we've heard from customers thus far, customers who are really committed to using the cloud, is that the best way to illustrate openness and customer flexibility is by what you actually provide and deliver for them."

Amazon noted that over the past three years, it has made its Web services available on different operating systems and programming languages.

Microsoft, for its part, said there were some things it agreed with in the manifesto, but others that were either too vague or did not reflect its interests. The company also objected to the fact that it was shown the document just last weekend, not allowed to make changes, and given just 48 hours to decide whether to sign.

"We were admittedly disappointed by the lack of openness in the development of the (Open) Cloud Manifesto," Microsoft's Steven Martin wrote in the blog post. "What we heard was that there was no desire to discuss, much less implement, enhancements to the document, despite the fact that we have learned through direct experience. Very recently, we were privately shown a copy of the document, warned that it was a secret, and told that it must be signed 'as is,' without modifications or additional input."

Martin wrote that "it appears to us that one company, or just a few companies, would prefer to control the evolution of cloud computing, as opposed to reaching a consensus across key stakeholders (including cloud users) through an 'open' process."

Although the document has yet to be released, one of its proponents, Enomaly's Reuven Cohen, has said it will be will be released on Monday. In a blog post, Cohen suggests that there will be at least a dozen signatories of the document, including "several of the largest technology companies."

"The manifesto does not speak to application code or licensing but instead to the fundamental principles that the Internet was founded upon--an open platform available to all," Cohen said. "It is a call to action for the worldwide cloud community to get involved and embrace the principles of the open cloud."

Cohen also posted a follow-up blog thanking Microsoft for the attention generated by the rejection of the manifesto.

"In one move, Microsoft has provided more visibility to our cloud interoperability effort than all our previous efforts combined," Cohen wrote.

As for the manifesto itself, we'll have to wait until Monday to see it, but Cohen's blog and this site give some idea where they are headed.

YouTube Blocked in China, Google Says

Google said Tuesday that its YouTube video-sharing Web site had been blocked in China.

Google said it did not know why the site had been blocked, but a report by the official Xinhua news agency of China on Tuesday said that supporters of the Dalai Lama had fabricated a video that appeared to show Chinese police officers brutally beating Tibetans after riots last year in Lhasa, the Tibetan capital.

Xinhua did not identify the video, but based on the description it appears to match a video available on YouTube that was recently released by the Tibetan government in exile.

It purports to show police officers storming a monastery after riots in Lhasa last March, kicking and beating protesters. It includes other instances of brutality and graphic images of a protester’s wounds. According to the video, the protester later died.

“We don’t know the reason for the block,” a Google spokesman, Scott Rubin, said. “Our government relations people are trying to resolve it.”

Mr. Rubin said that the company first noticed traffic from China had decreased sharply late Monday. By early Tuesday, he said, it had dropped to nearly zero.

China routinely filters Internet content and blocks material that is critical of its policies. It also frequently blocks individual videos on YouTube. YouTube was not blocked Tuesday or Wednesday in Hong Kong, the largely autonomous region of China. Beijing has not interfered with Internet sites there.

“The instant speculation is that YouTube is being blocked because the Tibetan government in exile released a particular video,” said Xiao Qiang, adjunct professor of journalism at the University of California, Berkeley, and editor of China Digital Times, a news Web site that chronicles political and economic changes in China.

Mr. Xiao said that the blocking of YouTube fit with what appeared to be an effort by China to step up its censorship of the Internet in recent months. Mr. Xiao said he was not surprised that YouTube was a target. It also hosts videos about the Tiananmen Square protests and many other subjects that Chinese authorities find objectionable.

The video about the beatings was pieced together from different places, Xinhua said on Tuesday, citing an unidentified official with the Tibetan regional government in China.

There has been no independent assessment of whether the video is authentic. In a statement sent via e-mail, Lobsang Nyandak, a representative of the Tibetan government in exile, said that the video was authentic.

The government did not directly address whether YouTube had been blocked. When asked about the matter at a news conference, a Foreign Ministry spokesman, Qin Gang, said: “Many people have a false impression that the Chinese government fears the Internet. In fact, it is just the opposite.”

Even as China steps up its censorship efforts, the country’s Internet participation is booming. Often, critics often find a way to avoid censors and debate controversial topics.

Ai Weiwei, a prominent Chinese artist, has been using his blog on Sina.com to criticize the government’s management of the rescue and relief efforts after the devastating earthquake in May in Sichuan Province.

In recent months, Beijing has announced major crackdowns on pornographic Web sites, even citing Google and other large companies for listing the sites on their search engines. Many critics say they believe that Beijing is using the word “pornography” as a rationale to eliminate Web sites that it deems troublesome.

YouTube has been blocked for varying periods of time in several countries, including Pakistan, Thailand and Turkey. These countries often state directly why they have acted.

David Barboza contributed reporting from Shanghai.

PTCL doubles its broadband speed at no extra cost

Islamabad—“As out gift to the nation on this Pakistan Day, PTCL has doubled your Broadband speed, at no extra cost” this was announced by Dr Sadik Al-Jadir, SEVP Commercial.

He further stated that “PTCL aspired to provide the fastest and most cost effective broadband access to all users in Pakistan. Being the largest IP Serviced provider, we have a vision to provide broadband access in all cities throughout the country.” PTCL broadband has made Kbps speeds obsolete by upgrading all packages to Mbps. The minimum package speed offered by PTCL is now 1 Mbps.

An existing user paying Rs 1199/- per month for a DSL 512K connection will now be upgraded to 1Mbps connection at no extra charge. The same goes for existing 1Mbps and 2Mbps connects, these will be upgraded to 2Mbps and 4Mbps connections at existing rates. This will make PTCL the fastest and the largest Broadband Service in Pakistan.

PTCL is the leading and the largest broadband service provider in Pakistan offering broadband in more than 130 major cities and towns i.e. Karachi, Hyderabad, Mirpurkhas, Hala, Sukkur, Jacobabad, Khairpur, Larkana, Multan, Bhaipheru, Okara, Pakpattan, Sahiwal, Faisalabad, Lahore, Islamabad, Rawalpindi, Abbottabad, Attock, Gujar Khan, Jehlum, Peshawar, Quetta etc.

Terrafugia's flying car makes maiden voyage

It may look like a Volkswagen Beetle in the belly of a carp, but the Terrafugia Transition (at right) is a bona fide flying car.

(Credit: Terrafugia)

This story has been updated. See below for details.

The start-up Terrafugia first popped up on our radar screens in early 2006 with a one-fifth scale model, $30,000 in prize money, and an urge to build a car that could fly. Or is that an airplane you can take on the highway?

Some signs point strongly to the latter. Terrafugia describes its Transition vehicle as a "roadable aircraft" and is pitching it in part as giving private pilots an easy travel alternative when bad weather makes flying a bad idea, or simply to avoid having to take a separate car to the airport. Also, in the eyes of the Federal Aviation Administration, the vehicle falls into the light sport aircraft category.

On March 5, Terrafugia got to show that--whatever the eventual business prospects--the Transition can indeed fly. The maiden voyage (the duration wasn't specified) took place at the Plattsburgh International Airport in New York, with a retired U.S. Air Force Reserve colonel in the pilot's seat. The flight followed six months of static, road, and taxi testing.

As a car, the two-seat Transition is designed to be easy on garages and oncoming traffic--its wings fold up quite snugly. In folded mode, the approximately 19-foot-long vehicle is 80 inches wide, and 6 feet, 9 inches high. As an airplane, it stands a few inches shorter and has a wingspan of 27 feet, 6 inches.

The vehicle runs off unleaded fuel from your run-of-the-mill gas station for both terrestrial and aerial travel, cruising at highway speeds on land and better than 115 miles per hour in the air.

But Woburn, Mass.-based Terrafugia (Latin for "escape from land") still has a long road ahead of it. The vehicle that flew earlier this month is still just a proof of concept, and a production prototype has yet to be built, tested, and certified. The company says it expects to make the first customer delivery of a Transition in 2011.

Photos: Terrafugia's flying car flies

Update March 20, 9:41 a.m. PDT: Terrafugia CEO/CTO Carl Dietrich rolled out the Transition for an appearance on the CBS Early Show. He said that the price tag for the carbon fiber-built vehicle is $194,000, and that the (refundable) deposit is $10,000.

In the video below, you can get a look at the controls inside the cockpit--er, at the driver's seat?--and watch the wings unfold.

Watch CBS Videos Online

Apple leaks 17-inch iMac for $899?

(Credit: Apple)

It's kind of funny when an Italian-language site breaks a wee bit of English-language-based Apple news, but that's what happened when SetteB.IT spotted a small mention of an $899 17-inch iMac for the education market on Apple's own Web site.

Currently, Apple is offering iMacs only in 20- and 24-inch screen sizes. The 20-inch model starts at $1,199, while the 24-incher starts at $1,499.

No word on when the "new" 17-incher will arrive (or if it's really new), but we'll await official confirmation from Apple.

Anybody interested? In this economy, I think the sub-$1,000 market is a good spot for Apple to play in--especially when it comes to cash-strapped parents of students.

The holy grail at security conference

VANCOUVER, B.C.--That innocent-looking mobile phone you use to call your mother and check e-mail represents the next frontier for malicious hackers, though it eluded researchers who stood to earn $10,000 for exploiting a smartphone at the CanSecWest security conference this week.

TippingPoint Technologies, which sponsors a Pwn2Own hacking contest each year at the event, was offering the prize money for each successful exploit of an iPhone, BlackBerry, and phones running Google's Android, Windows Mobile, and Symbian operating systems.

Researcher Dino Dai Zovi, on the left, discovered a vulnerability in QuickTime and won the Pwn2Own contest at CanSecWest two years ago remotely by having a friend act on his behalf. At this year's show, he served as a proxy for a researcher in Italy who was participating in the contest remotely, trying to exploit a Symbian-based smartphone. The exploit attempt failed, and no one won the $10,000 smartphone exploit prize. Next to him is TippingPoint security researcher Aaron Portnoy.

(Credit: Elinor Mills/CNET News)

On Friday, a researcher in Italy wanted to participate in the contest remotely and was told he had to find someone at the show to serve as his proxy and physically use the mobile device to surf to the site where the malicious code is located. He found a proxy, but the exploit attempted on a Nokia phone running Symbian failed. Another researcher had tried to exploit the Symbian and BlackBerry systems on Thursday but failed.

Much of the first day of the three-day event on Wednesday was devoted to mobile security. Dragos Ruiu, who first organized CanSecWest 10 years ago, said he wanted to focus on mobile this year because of the ubiquity of the devices and the increasing risk they pose to information security.

"I carry two phones at any one time," he said, pointing to one in his pants pocket and another in his jacket pocket. "And now, they are more capable computers."

Ruiu wasn't sure why the mobile devices hadn't been hacked, while a similar browser-hacking contest had seen the major browsers exploited on the first day of the conference. "Maybe they are too bleeding-edge; maybe they are just difficult to develop exploits for," he said of the mobile platforms. "It's good news."

In an informal survey, attendees said they suspected that researchers were just being lazy in not turning their attention to mobile attacks at the show.

"Mobile-phone research is an emerging field," said Aaron Portnoy, a security researcher at TippingPoint. "Not many people have the prerequisite knowledge to exploit them, nor do they have an exploit prepared."

Things will undoubtedly be different by next year's CanSecWest, he said, adding that already, there are mobile exploits in the wild.

"There's a lot we don't know yet about them," said Charlie Miller, who exploited the Safari browser in about 10 seconds on Wednesday, winning $5,000 and the MacBook Pro used to perform the feat. (The other major browsers were exploited shortly thereafter.)

"They are all different platforms, different hardware," he said, adding that "there's a learning curve associated with it."

In his presentation on security in Google's Android mobile platform, University of Michigan graduate student Jon Oberheide said the code in mobile software is newer than that found on the desktop and less robust against attacks. Attackers aren't really targeting it yet because mobile phones aren't seen as being much use for sending spam and launching denial-of-service attacks, however, they are good for attacks targeted at individuals, he said.

Oberheide said smartphones are at risk of a man-in-the-middle type of attack in which a malicious attacker could interfere with data communications between the device and a trusted Web server. For instance, an attacker could send a spoof message saying an update for a Facebook app is available and instead send malicious code, he said.

In a presentation titled "The Smart-Phones Nightmare," researcher Sergio Alvarez pointed out all the different attack vectors for mobile devices, including e-mail, attachments, Web pages, SMS, MMS, Facebook, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth.

Craigslist bests MySpace as top search term

People apparently turn to Craigslist in a down economy.

(Credit: Hitwise)

Craigslist overtook MySpace as the most searched-for term on the Web last week, according to traffic-tracking firm Hitwise.

"U.S. searches on the term 'Craigslist' have increased 105 percent for the week ending March 14, 2009, compared with the same week last year," Hitwise reported. MySpace has been the top term since March 11, 2006.

This was the first time in three years that searches for Craigslist topped MySpace, Hitwise said.

The research group suggested more consumers are logging on at Craigslist, the Web's largest classifieds publication, as the ailing economy prods them to look for bargains.

Craigslist spokeswoman Susan MacTavish Best said the privately held company, headquartered in San Francisco, has seen a sharp uptick in business.

Over the past year, bartering on the site is up 100 percent while roommate ads have jumped 65 percent, she said. Classified ads for garage sales have doubled and For Sale postings are up 75 percent.

Google designer leaves, blaming

Douglas Bowman, Google's visual design leader, is leaving the company after finding the company's reliance on detailed Web page performance data too confining.

Bowman clearly had mixed feelings about departing, but he wasn't shy with his opinion about what he didn't like. From Bowman's blog post Friday on the matter:

When a company is filled with engineers, it turns to engineering to solve problems. Reduce each decision to a simple logic problem. Remove all subjectivity and just look at the data...that data eventually becomes a crutch for every decision, paralyzing the company and preventing it from making any daring design decisions...

Yes, it's true that a team at Google couldn't decide between two blues, so they're testing 41 shades between each blue to see which one performs better. I had a recent debate over whether a border should be 3, 4, or 5 pixels wide, and was asked to prove my case. I can't operate in an environment like that. I've grown tired of debating such minuscule design decisions...

I'll miss working with the incredibly smart and talented people I got to know there. But I won't miss a design philosophy that lives or dies strictly by the sword of data.

Bowman also gripes that Google's designers came from a background of computer science and human-computer interaction rather than classical design, and that none of them rank high in the pecking order.

Google's vice president of search and user experience, Marissa Mayer, is pretty high-ranking and cares a lot about design. But it's not hard to see how her philosophy might rankle. Here's one thing she said about design in a 2008 speech: "On the Web in general, (creating sites) is much more a design than an art...You can find small differences and mathematically learn which is right."

I can't speak for Bowman's experience, though I can see how a classical designer might feel stifled by code monkeys. There are plenty of considerations that go into design in general, and pragmatism can be at odds sometimes with passion, boldness, and innovation. And Bowman earlier was a designer at Wired, which is definitely at the bold end of the spectrum.

Overall, however, I find Google's approach to design refreshing and radical in its own way. Choosing color shades and pixel widths on the basis of the behavior of millions of Web page users is a fascinating development to the form-follows-function school of design.

StarWind Software Becomes IBM Business Partner

StarWind to Offer Open iSCSI SAN on IBM Servers Making Leading Storage Virtualization Solution Available to IBM Server Customers and VARs

BURLINGTON, MA -- (Marketwire) -- 03/18/09 -- StarWind Software, the global leader in storage virtualization and iSCSI SAN software, today announced it has joined IBM's PartnerWorld technology alliance program. By becoming an IBM partner, StarWind is further enhancing its relationship with IBM and is taking the step to integrate its signature StarWind iSCSI SAN software with IBM servers such as IBM x3655 and IBM BladeCenter to provide its channel partners with more choices and flexibility for their customers' SAN and virtualization deployments.

As part of the PartnerWorld program, StarWind and IBM commit to working together on joint marketing, collaborative selling, software integration and performance optimization. The relationship will deliver enhanced disaster recovery and business continuity for IBM customers. StarWind will enable IBM customers to cluster their IBM System X servers running Windows Server 2008 for high availability and disaster recovery allowing StarWind iSCSI SAN to function as shared storage for server clusters, offering enterprise-class features such as CDP & Snapshots and Mirroring & Replication.

"We are pleased to join the PartnerWorld network to market our joint solutions to customers. IBM customers can now run StarWind iSCSI SAN on high-performance IBM System X servers for disaster recovery and virtualization projects," said Zorian Rotenberg, President and CEO, StarWind Software. "Our partnership with IBM not only broadens our reach but also provides IBM customers with one of the most advanced, reliable and affordable iSCSI SAN solutions available today."

StarWind iSCSI SAN Server 4.0 is a cost-effective, open iSCSI SAN software solution that can be installed on a high-performance server such as IBM x3655 running Windows Server 2008, converting it into a reliable, powerful, and full-featured SAN. Designed to work with leading virtualization solutions such as VMware ESX, StarWind iSCSI SAN supports IBM System X and IBM BladeCenter servers listed within VMware ESX Hardware Compatibility List (HCL). The combination of IBM x3655s with its 1.8 TB hot-swap, high-performance, serial-attached SCSI (SAS) disk drives or 4.5 TB hot-swap SATA drives with StarWind iSCSI SAN is an ideal choice for high I/O and transactional applications such as Microsoft SQL Server, Microsoft Exchange Server, and Oracle. StarWind also supports IBM's AIX iSCSI Initiator.

IBM's PartnerWorld is a marketing and enablement ecosystem designed to create new revenue and market opportunities for IBM's Business Partners and provide customers with e-business solutions including products, services, technologies and financing. The partnership provides StarWind with access to IBM's customers and partners and assures IBM customers that StarWind iSCSI SAN has passed rigorous testing with IBM System X servers.

IBM customers can download StarWind iSCSI SAN 4.0 trial at the company website www.StarWindSoftware.com which takes less than 20 minutes to download and install.

About StarWind Software Inc.

StarWind Software is a leading global provider of reliable, powerful and affordable iSCSI SAN and storage virtualization solutions. StarWind Server is an iSCSI SAN software that converts any Windows Server into a powerful SAN and is designed for use with solutions such as VMware ESX and VMware ESXi, Citrix XenServer, Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2008 and Microsoft Windows Server clusters for databases applications such as Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server, Microsoft Exchange and Microsoft SharePoint Server. StarWind is an affordable IP SAN solution and combines an ease of use with enterprise-class features such as Mirroring and Replication, CDP and Snapshots, Thin Provisioning and Virtual Tape Library (VTL). Since 2003, StarWind has pioneered the iSCSI SAN industry and has been the solution of choice for thousands of global customers in over 50 countries, from small and mid-size businesses, to governments, and to Fortune 1000 clients.

StarWind Software and the StarWind logos are trademarks and/or registered trademarks of StarWind Software Inc. or its affiliates in the U.S. and other countries. Other names are trademarks and/or registered trademarks of their respective owners.

Fujitsu Announces First Color E-Paper Terminal FLEPia

Color e-books are indeed coming. Fujitsu Frontech and Fujitsu Laboratories Limtiedhas announced the first color e-paper mobile terminal called the FLEPia. It is available for purchase now in Japan. It has an 8 inch high definition display capable of showing up to 260,000 colors. It comes with Bluetooth and WiFi radios and supposedly will run up to 40 hours of continuous use.

According to the press release it does not require power to display a screen image only drawing down the battery for screen refreshes. Yes there is a touch screen and it also includes a stylus. Storage for e-books looks to be on an SD card.

The device currently reads two e-book formats: XMDF and .book. The FLEPia also runs Windows CE for web browsing, email, and according to the users can use Microsoft Office to generate and view documents.

Check out the press release after the jump.

Tokyo and Kawasaki, Japan, March 18, 2009 – Fujitsu Frontech Limited and Fujitsu Laboratories Limited today announced the start of consumer sales in Japan of the world’s first color e-paper mobile terminal, FLEPia, available for purchase from today through Fujitsu Frontech’s online store “FrontechDirect”. Developed by Fujitsu Frontech and Fujitsu Laboratories, FLEPia is the first ever mobile information terminal to feature color electronic paper (color e-paper). In addition to being lightweight and thin, the color e-paper mobile terminal features an easy-to-view 8-inch display screen capable of showing up to 260,000 colors in high-definition, in addition to being equipped with Bluetooth and high-speed wireless LAN. FLEPia is also power-efficient, enabling up to 40 hours of continuous battery operation when fully charged, and does not require power for continuous display of a screen image, consuming power only during re-draw. Featuring significant storage capabilities, when used with a 4GB SD card, the color e-paper terminal can store the equivalent of 5,000 conventional paper-based books when each book is 300 pages long at 600KB per book, thus being environmentally friendly. In Japan, FLEPia can now be easily ordered from Fujitsu Frontech’s online store. As an additional option, through Fujitsu Frontech’s dedicated website, FLEPia users can purchase e-books from the largest e-book online retailer in Japan and download the e-books directly into FLEPia. As the only color e-paper mobile terminal commercially available, FLEPia offers a convenient, paper-free and eco-conscious enriched innovative mobile reading experience to users.

Social networks 'are new e-mail'

Facebook is the dominant platform for status updates

Status updates on sites such as Facebook, Yammer, Twitter and Friendfeed are a new form of communication, the South by SouthWest Festival has heard.

"We are all in the process of creating e-mail 2.0," David Sacks, founder of business social network Yammer said.

Tens of millions of people are using social networks to stay in touch.

The growth in such services is being heralded as the start of the real-time, pervasive web.

'New communication'

Mr Sacks said: "What people want to do on social network these days is post status updates. We think it's all people want to do."

Yammer is an enterprise social network, designed to facilitate communication within companies and organisations.

It is one of a growing number of services that lets users share micro-updates. Other services have a richer mix of content, including sharing photos and video, and allowing comments from people within your social network, building a so-called activity stream.

"I think it's a new form of communication; not quite e-mail, more lightweight and more real time, often with little bit of a publishing flavour to it," said Paul Buchheit, founder of FriendFeed, and the creator and lead developer of GMail, while at Google.

FriendFeed lets users share content from other services, such as Twitter and Flickr, and comment directly on the postings in real-time.

Simplicity and ubiquity

With more than 175 million users Facebook is the dominant platform for status updates.

Ari Steinberg, an engineering manager at the firm, told BBC News: "It's been interesting to see the way people change the way they communicate.

"You used to e-mail content to people and you had to choose who you wanted to e-mail it to and you didn't know if your friends even wanted to see it.

"Now you can passively put something out there and let people engage with it."

The simplicity and ubiquity of some of these services is beginning to see activity feeds and status updates replace many of the uses to which e-mail was once put.

Mr Sacks said: "It's no coincidence that these products are all looking like e-mail.

"These products are all standardising around a message form at the top, and the inbox which is a feed then folders around the side."

'Open system'

The problem with the current crop of status update services is that they are to varying degrees interoperable.

For example, while Twitter can be used to power a status update on Facebook the same is not true in reverse.

"We want to see a more open system where everything links together, the same as it does with e-mail," he said.

While e-mail has common protocols which allow people to send and receive messages even if they are with different services, such as Hotmail or GMail, the same is not completely true with status updates and activity feeds.

There are some standard protocols but the rapid development in the complexity and breadth of activity feeds, to include comments and ratings, has led to a series of walled gardens.

Dare Obasanjo, a program manager at Microsoft, said the firm was working on a set of standards.

"You need to give sites permission to get your data," he said.

'Hard to compete'

The complex nuances of relationships on social networks, with users having different degrees of openness with different friends or followers, further complicates the introduction of standards.

Facebook has also been accused of being unwilling to open up its system and work with other status update firms, and there is a belief among some that the social network is enacting a "land grab" in an effort to become the de-facto platform.

Mr Sacks said: "On the consumer side Facebook could become the one site for all social messaging. That becomes very hard to compete with."

But Mr Buccheit said he believed the different firms were moving towards a more federated system.

"There will be no separation between Facebook and Friendfeed and Twitter."

Mr Steinberg said: "We are totally happy to interoperate with other sites."

He told BBC News that interoperability wasn't necessary for activity streams to become a global messaging service.

"It's definitely something and a pretty cool thing we would like to enable. Conceptually it makes a lot of sense.

"It's in our interests to let people share. Twitter has had a lot of success in letting people taking their data and sharing it externally.

"We'd love to be able to let people tap into that."

Microsoft Opens Blinds on Windows Mobile App Store

Microsoft has offered more detailed information about how it will manage its upcoming mobile application store. Developers' fee structures were detailed, as were revenue-sharing models -- a 70/30 split, just like Apple's mobile app structure. It also promised a great deal of transparency about what types of applications would be allowed to distribute through the store.

Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) on Wednesday revealed more details about how its upcoming Windows Marketplace for Mobile app store will work and its strategy for luring more developers to the Windows Mobile platform.

The software giant will give developers a 70 percent cut of all sales generated by their applications on the new app store -- the same percentage that Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) gives to app developers for the popular iPhone.

Microsoft will also "provide transparency throughout the certification process of each app submitted" as well as "guidance and support from the stage of development to the final sale to the consumer," the company said.

Developers will set the prices for their applications and can also choose to distribute their applications at no cost. In other words, the new Windows Mobile app store isn't the only place where developers can sell their wares.

Microsoft will charge a US$99 annual registration fee to developers who want to submit their applications for sale on the new app store. The first five application submissions to Windows Marketplace for Mobile are included in the introductory fee. Each additional submission within the annual period will cost $99.

Microsoft's stock was up 1.82 percent to $16.78 per share in mid-day trading on Wednesday.

YouTube vs. Royalties, Spy vs. Spy, Dell vs. a Firehose

YouTube, UK royalties agency get into it ... U.S. Cybersecurity czar takes a hike ... Dell rolls out rugged laptop ... Google tries out expanding advertisements ... sheriff sues Craigslist over prostitution ... Google's Schmidt denies interest in Twitter purchase, and more.

MTV pretty much gave up on music years ago in order to concentrate on how many different variations of "The Real World" and "Road Rules" it could squeeze out. But YouTube has largely picked up MTV's slack -- type in just about any video you want to see, and Google's (Nasdaq: GOOG) sharing site will play it for you.

Or perhaps not, if you're living in the UK. YouTube is in a legal standoff with PRS for Music, a UK outfit that collects royalties for musical artists.

YouTube says PRS wants it to pay too much money each time users click on a music video of one of their artists. It also alleges that the arrangement PRS has proposed wouldn't even specify which songs would be included in each license it wants to sell. The deadlock's been going on for months, and YouTube has finally crimped the hose -- no more music videos for UK viewers.

They'll have to resort to music videos the old-fashioned way, which involves holding your breath and spinning in circles while listening to a tune. Works every time, and it's usually just as good.

Google ad exec tapped to head AOL

Time Warner's CEO Jeff Bewkes announced this evening that AOL's current chairman and CEO Randy Falco will be replaced by Tim Armstrong, President of Google's American Operations and board member of the Advertising Council, the Interactive Advertising Bureau, and The Advertising Research Foundation.

Bewkes called Armstrong an advertising pioneer, who has "a stellar reputation and proven track record." Armstrong will also be of crucial importance in Time Warner's decisions about the future of the AOL brand.

The timing of this appointment could prove critical in several aspects of AOL's business. The advancement of AOL Classifieds, which is a classified advertisement service, for one, stands to benefit from Armstrong's expertise in the advertising field. AOL Classifieds is stepping up to Craigslist and the weakening eBay by selling classified ad listings based upon their visibility. The pool of listings comes from some 80,000 sources from Oodle, including MySpace Classifieds, Washington Post Express, and Petfinder.com.

Even further into Armstrong's realm of expertise is AOL's Platform-A advertising network, which is actually more successful than both Yahoo and Google in terms of US online audience reach.

Bewkes announced that CEO Randy Falco and COO Ron Grant will be leaving the company after Armstrong transitions into the leadership position. "Under Randy and Ron, AOL's programming sites exhibited year-over-year growth in unique visitors for 23 consecutive months with many of its sites now in the top five of their categories," Bewkes said. "They also assembled Platform-A, the number one display ad network in the US with a reach of more than 90%. They also aggressively cut costs as they restructured the Audience business portion of the company into three distinct operating units: People Networks, MediaGlow, and Platform-A. As Randy and Ron move on, they leave AOL with our gratitude and appreciation for remaking the company and bringing it to a new and promising level."

This is all part of a continuing evolution at AOL, which has successfully transitioned the company from the number one ISP of the dialup era into the #4 Web property owner in the US, whose sites attract some 57% of all US Internet users.

It's a more solid-state Sun, embedding flash memory in servers

As the latest step in its gradual move to "end-to-end" flash, Sun has unveiled solid-state drive options for some of its high-end servers.

This week, Sun announced solid-state disk technology as an option for its x64 and chip multi-threaded (CMT) rack and blade servers, along with free trial and pricing discount offers. In addition, it rolled out the Sun Flash Analyzer, a new software tool for helping customers leverage SSD-based servers to raise application performance.

The company's overall flash effort is particularly ambitious and far reaching, even though Sun isn't the first vendor to offer SSD flash as a server option, according to some analysts. IBM, for example, beat Sun out the door with SSD-enabled servers way back in 2007, noted Charles King, principal analyst at Pund-IT, in an interview with Betanews.

Yet Sun's "end-to-end" SSD initiative, first unveiled early last year, already includes Solaris ZFS, a file system "optimized" for SSDs, along with SSD storage disk arrays, an area where vendors such as EMC, Dell, and smaller specialists Pillar Data Systems and Fusion are now playing, too. Sun launched its first SSD storage arrays -- the Sun Storage 7000 Unified Storage Systems with Integrated Flash -- in November of 2008.

"SSDs aren't for everyone, though," according to King. SSDs remain a lot pricier than traditional hard disk drives, so that use of the alternative drives makes the most financial sense among databases and other applications that can really benefit from SSDs' high throughput with faster response times.

The new Sun Flash Analyzer -- available as a download for Solaris 10, Windows, and Linux OS -- is designed to identify applications in this category and also to make suggestions about methods of increasing system performance.

To help drive down costs of SSD deployment, SSDs are often combined with other storage technologies in hybrid configurations, King observed. For instance, Sun's ZFS for the Solaris OS supports "hybrid storage pools" of SSDs, HDDs, and DRAM.

Sun is also touting its SSD-enabled servers as reducing power consumption by 38% over HDDs.

Despite the grim economy, Sun's timing with the server announcement seems propitious. While SSDs still don't come cheap, pricing on the drives has dropped eightfold over the past year, King contended.

Sun's SSD servers start at $3,240 for a Sun Fire X6560 blade system. It's also selling its SSD flash technology on a standalone basis, for prices starting at $1,199.

As extra incentives for customers to begin getting familiar with SSD servers now, Sun is offering 60-day free trials through its Try and Buy program, with discounts for systems of 20% to 40%.

(2nd part)Firefox 3.1 JavaScript outpaced by Safari 4, Google Chrome

Our test suites include the three benchmarks we used last week to demonstrate Safari 4, including HowToCreate's CSS rendering test (since the rendering times can vary, we averaged the times for five renders for each browser), developer Sean Patrick Kane's octathlon which renders a cumulative speed after a battery of eight tests, and the Web Standards Project's Acid3 compliance test, which renders its score as a percentage.

To these, we added one more suite: the SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark, a pentathlon of real-world simulations that include elements like AES, MD5, and SHA1 cryptography puzzles; ray-tracing formulas; and handling of JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) expressions. With this and the Celtic Kane battery, we'll be able to find out where any browser excels and where it fails. Each of our four suites produced a cumulative index score, which we then counted toward 25% of the final score.

The final index scores for our tests indicate one thing conclusively: The performance differences between all the major Windows-based Web browsers, compared to one another, are clearly perceptible. No test browser is close to any other; in everyday use, the differences in JavaScript rendering speed are enough to be seen with the naked eye.

And there is a clear leader in that department: Apple Safari 4.

Microsoft can say that its IE8 candidate has more than double the performance of its predecessor, and it can probably smile at that. IE8 RC1's index score is 2.19. However, the latest Safari 4 beta's score under the same conditions is 14.39, blowing away anything Microsoft produces. We expected more from the Opera 10 alpha, given what that browser's faithful followers told us. But with an index score of 5.38, Opera's performance right now is bested by Firefox 3.1 Beta 3, which finished with a 7.85. But Mozilla will have to settle for the bronze for now. Google Chrome is the one vying for the lead, with a second-place score of 11.62.

What were the browsers' strong points? Safari 4 scored well in the HowToCreate box rendering experiment. In the Celtic Kane battery, Safari shined with regular expressions, handling the Document Object Model, and at parsing RegEx expressions -- on that one part alone, Safari scored a 13.94 versus IE7. Its AJAX parser also proved strong. But the SunSpider benchmark was able to highlight some even brighter points for Safari, including just the way it manages control of scripts. In that heat, it scored a 90.94 versus IE7. And scoring 100% on the Acid3 certainly helps.

Chrome has clear strengths and weaknesses. It was not the fastest at the HowToCreate rendering experiment, scoring only 4.73 against IE7. Its 79% score on the Acid3 set it back. But it managed to outperform even Safari 4 in the SunSpider suite, with a 33.36 overall versus 32.81 for Safari. The control flow heat alone produced a 148.37 for Chrome versus IE7, which is testament to how well that browser's unique system architecture pays off.

The browser that will be Firefox 3.5 has some ground to make up. It actually performed rather poorly with the HowToCreate rendering test, actually loading the test slower than IE7 (0.93) and producing a rendering score of only 1.83. Its 93% score on the Acid3 is the best we've ever seen from a Mozilla browser. However, if this were a math quiz, Firefox 3.1 Beta 3 would win hands down, and here is where we're seeing that "orders of magnitude" difference we were promised for TraceMonkey: In the math heat of SunSpider, Firefox pulled off a 17.24, compared to 8.97 for Chrome and 6.93 for Safari.

Since last December, Opera has waved its flag high atop the mountain that is the 100% Acid3 score, and we saw it again yesterday. Opera did win the day on the HowToCreate rendering test, scoring a 5.03 -- the highest of the test browsers, although that score was offset by its slower loading speed. But Opera couldn't keep up in the octathlon and pentathlon, scoring only 3.05 and 6.67, respectively -- the lowest scores for any non-Microsoft browser.

Internet Explorer 8 was never expected to be a breakthrough performer. What we did not expect was a rendering score that is actually slower than IE7 (0.83). IE8 put in an appreciable 5.05 on the SunSpider suite and a less-than-appreciable 1.67 on the Celtic Kane suite. But scoring merely 20% on the Acid3, these days, may not be forgivable.

During the era of the so-called "browser wars," the only real matchup was between Netscape Navigator and Microsoft Internet Explorer. And that wasn't even really a battle on equal terms, but rather one between performance and functionality versus convenience. IE won that battle. So the fact that we are actually comparing Web browsers' performance on an equal scale today is symbolic of the fact that this market, for the very first time in its history, may be becoming truly competitive.

Tests: Firefox 3.1 JavaScript outpaced by Safari 4, Google Chrome

Internet enthusiasts today are getting their first glimpse of the TraceMonkey JavaScript interpreter that Mozilla claims will be one of the principal reasons to own and use Firefox 3.5 -- what the latest Firefox will inevitably be called once the numerology gets sorted out. A fresh round of comprehensive Betanews tests Thursday afternoon indicate that Firefox 3.1 Beta 3 will demonstrate close to eight times the general JavaScript calculation and rendering performance of Microsoft Internet Explorer 7 -- a clear performance gain.

But as we were able to verify Thursday, it may not be nearly enough to earn the latest Mozilla beta the performance lead. In a battery of 20 calculation and rendering tests assembled from four different developers' benchmarks and benchmark suites, Apple's Safari 4 beta for Windows perceptibly and appreciably outperformed every other test browser on our virtual machine.

There is no widely accepted industry standard benchmark suite for Web browser performance just yet, but there are quite a few potential nominees. Over the last few weeks, we've been discovering some that were created by independent developers and shared with the rest of the world through Web sites.

In an effort to produce a fair and unbiased rendering of JavaScript engines' relative performance -- something closer to what you'd expect if we were comparing six different grades of CPU to one another -- we gathered a group of respectable benchmarks that appear to cover the gamut for different types of workloads: cryptography, data handling, DOM handling, AJAX declarations, parsing regular string expressions, string manipulation, mathematics, rendering, compliance with standards. And we re-cleaned and re-assembled our Windows Vista SP1-based virtual machine -- again, not the best candidate for a "super-speedway," but a plausible venue for an unencumbered test of how the latest experimental beta, alpha, and release candidate versions of major Web browsers perform in comparison to one another. (Though Google lifted the "beta" designation from its Chrome browser, its development is continually tested and its clients are automatically updated to reflect results from those tests, so we included the latest Chrome edition with the other brands.)

Firefox 3.1 Beta 3 was released to the general public yesterday. We spent a good part of yesterday comparing that release to the first Apple Safari 4 beta for Windows -- which performed astonishingly well in our initial tests -- as well as Google Chrome, Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 Release Candidate 1, and in response to many of our readers' requests, the latest alpha edition of Opera 10.

Knowing that our test venue would be an arguably slow virtual system, our goal here was to test relative performance -- to illuminate the scale of performance differences that all users would likely see on their own, probably faster systems. The way we chose to represent relative performance is by creating a base index -- something we already know to be slow and that we expect will be outpaced.

So we ran our series of tests on the most recently updated version of Internet Explorer 7, prior to upgrading our test VM once again to run IE8 RC1. For each test, we gave IE7 a score of 1.0, to serve as our baseline. We then used four benchmark "suites" for which every final result is rendered relative to that 1.0; so for example, a score of 2.3 on a speed test would mean the browser was 230% the speed of IE7. And for the Acid3 benchmark, which tests compliance, an index score of 8.0 for a browser would mean its rendering score would be eight times better than for IE7.

Intel's Atom and the return of the thin client

Decades ago, one of the most viable arguments for major enterprises holding onto their "big iron" -- their aging mainframes -- was that they could still provide processing power for thin clients, the smaller and less expensive terminals that didn't need the speed to crunch numbers. Today, in the era of virtualization, the concept of shifting processing power back to the data center has been reborn, especially with the deployment of lighter-weight, single-core processors that only provide the power needed to render results.

With that, a thin-client manufacturer named Devon IT this week announced it's shipping a little PC called the TC5 that frankly isn't much smarter than many smartphones these days...but it doesn't need to be. It's shipping with Intel's single-core Atom N270 processor clocked at 1.66 GHz, which isn't much; it uses Intel's GMA 950 embedded graphics, which also isn't much; and it has Windows XP or Linux on board rather than Windows Vista, and you know the drill there now. So what's its purpose? To serve as a wired or wireless network receiver and to pump data to the screen as fast as possible...and besides gathering user input, that's about it. Its design enables it to run one program -- maybe the only one it ever has to run: a desktop virtualization host.

The host Devon IT prefers is Citrix XenDesktop, which now utilizes a protocol called HDX to virtualize not only CPU processing but also GPU-related graphics, including 3D and multimedia, executing all of these tasks at the data center. All the real processing power is housed at the core, and only the results are distributed to the Devon IT display. Think of it like SlingPlayer Mobile, but for everyday processing -- your viewing device doesn't really need to be all that smart just to deliver the functionality you already own in your central processor.

Up to now, Devon IT had been producing TC2 thin clients using Via single-core processors -- right now, the single-core niches are pretty much Via's last stand, and it's getting big competition from Intel Atom. Pricing for TC5 is not published, and likely depends on quantity purchased -- IBM is partnering with Devon IT for marketing and sales. But to give you an idea of scale: As soon as TC5 was introduced, the company began a one-week markdown sale on the TC2: $159 for the first four units, and $59 for the fifth.

Who's this being marketed to? Right now, Devon IT is making its pitch to hospitals that are growing faster than they can keep up with, to schools that need IT infrastructures and that have limited budgets for putting PCs in every classroom, and -- get this -- to banks and financial institutions that are experiencing more limited growth opportunities in this weak economy.